求剑桥雅思7 test2 阅读第1、 6、33、37、39 详解（2023年2月1日雅思阅读真题回忆）

今天大学路小编整理了求剑桥雅思7 test2 阅读第1、 6、33、37、39 详解（2023年2月1日雅思阅读真题回忆）相关内容，希望能帮助到大家，一起来看下吧。

本文目录一览：

• 1、求剑桥雅思7 test2 阅读第1、 6、33、37、39 详解
• 2、2023年2月1日雅思阅读真题回忆
• 3、剑桥雅思17和12难度对比

求剑桥雅思7 test2 阅读第1、 6、33、37、39 详解

前者是在过去的1400年里，后者是 最后的1400年。原文是说：记录表明，在1400看里只有两个宝塔倒塌，是对原文的同意转述//
6、答案选 A，通过选用更加沉重的陶瓦，而非中国塔所用的瓷瓦来铺盖伸出来的屋檐。
33、一般的家庭平均花7小时用于个人交通和货物运输，题目是说交能方面的支出，与原文信息相反了。。
37、答案I 原文说是提高现存交通服务效率方面的工作不是非常 成功，原因是大多数汽车出现故障，但是没有维修资源，选项中的efficient 是对原文的efficiency 是原文的同意转述。
39、答案E，选项中的improved 对应原文的improvement 又是一种改写：道 路的改善和相关的维修系统已帮助马克特中心地区全年都容易进入，来自外地的生活必需品在市 场 上可以很容易*到，价格也不像过去那样波动不定。。

2023年2月1日雅思阅读真题回忆

您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。在追寻留学梦想的路上，选择合适的学校和专业，准备相关考试，都可能让人感到迷茫和困扰。作为一名有经验的留学顾问，我在此为您提供全方位的专业咨询和指导。欢迎随时提问！
阅读考试一直是不少学生比较头疼的部分，那么2月份的雅思阅读考试真题如何呢？这估计是不少人士感兴趣的话题，和小钟老师一起来看看2023年2月1日雅思阅读真题回忆，欢迎阅读。
2023年2月1日雅思阅读真题回忆
权威点评
这次考试阅读部分的第1篇文章不论是从主题和题型来看都比较简单，是建议尽可能在15分钟内高效完成的类型。第3篇重复考到了以前的旧题。3篇文章的内容，人文社科类的偏多。总体而言，这次的阅读难易程度居中。
Passage 1
题目
英国农业
话题分类
社会科学
题型及对应数量
填空题:7题
判断题：6题
内容回忆
本文讲英国农业问题，农作物对环境的影响，以及粮食不足的问题。
文章一部分讲在非洲进口粮食会更加环保，节省欧洲用地和降低对环境的影响，但后面又说在欧洲本地种植农作物也挺好，不过成本较高。
题目回忆
暂缺
参考阅读
C12T6P1
Passage 2
题目
古埃及壁画
话题分类
人文科学
题型及数量
人名观点匹配题、填空题
内容回忆
在古埃及壁画上发现海运，由此列出4个科学家对此的观点和研究成果。
题目回忆
暂缺
参考阅读
C7T4P1
Passage 3
题目
Communication in science/科学界交流
话题分类
人文科学
题型及数量
选择题（5）、判断题（4）、Summary填空题（5）
内容回忆
参考原文：
AScience plays an increasingly significant role in people’s lives, making the faithful communication of scientific developments more important than ever.Yet such communication is fraught with challenges that can easily distort discussions, leading to unnecessary confusion and misunderstandings.

BSome problems stem from the esoteric nature of current research and the associated difficulty of finding sufficiently faithful terminology. Abstraction and complexity are not signs that a given scientific direction is wrong, as some commentators have suggested, but are instead a tribute to the success of human ingenuity in meeting the increasingly complex challenges that nature presents. They can, however, make communication more difficult. But many of the biggest challenges for science reporting arise because in areas of evolving research, scientists themselves often only partly understand the full implications of any particular advance or development. Since that dynamicapplies to most of the scientific developments that directly affect people’s lives global warming, cancer research, diet studies—learning how to overcome it is critical to spurringa more informed scientific debate among the broader public.

CAmbiguous word choices are the source of some misunderstandings. Scientists often employ colloquial terminology, which they then assign a specific meaning that is impossible to fathomwithout proper training.The term “relativity,” for example, is intrinsically misleading. Many interpret the theory to mean that everything is relative and there are no absolutes. Yet although the measurements any observer makes depend on his coordinates and reference frame, the physical phenomena he measures have an invariant description that transcends that observer’s particular coordinates. Einstein’s theory of relativity is really about finding an invariant description of physical
phenomena. True, Einstein agreed with the idea that his theory would have been better named “Invariantentheorie.” But the term “relativity” was already entrenched at the time for him to change.

D“The uncertainty principle” is another frequently abused term. It is sometimesinterpreted as a limitation on observers and their ability to make measurements.

E But it is not about intrinsic limitations on any one particular measurement;it is about the inability to precisely measure particular pairs of quantitiessimultaneously? The first interpretation is perhaps more engaging from aphilosophical or political perspective. It’s just not what the science is about.

FEven the word “theory” can be a problem. Unlike most people, who usethe word to describe a passing conjecture that they often regard as suspect,physicists have very specific ideas in mind when they talk about theories.For physicists, theories entail a definite physical framework embodied in aset of fundamental assumptions about the world that lead to a specific set ofequations and predictions—ones that are borne out by successful predictions.Theories aren’t necessarily shown to be correct or complete immediately.Even Einstein took the better part of a decade to develop the correct versionof his theory of general relativity. But eventually both the ideas and themeasurements settle down and theories are either proven correct, abandoned orabsorbed into other, more encompassing theories.

G“Global warming” is another example of problematic terminology.Climatologists predict more drastic fluctuations in temperatureandrainfall— not necessarily that every place will be warmer. The namesometimes subverts the debate, since it lets people argue that their winter wasworse, so how could there be global warming? Clearly “global climate change”would have been a better name. But not all problems stem solely from poorword choices. Some stem from the intrinsically complex nature of much ofmodern science. Science sometimes transcends this limitation: remarkably,chemists were able to detail the precise chemical processes involved in thedestruction of the ozone layer, making the evidence that chlorofluorocarbongases (Freon, for example) were destroying the ozone layer indisputable.

HA better understanding of the mathematical significance of results and lessinsistence on a simple story would help to clarifymany scientific discussions.For several months, Harvard was tortured months, Harvard was torturedby empty debates over the relative intrinsic scientific abilities of men andwomen. One of the more amusing aspects of the discussion was that thosewho believed in the differences and those who didn’t used the same evidenceabout gender-specific special ability. How could that be? The answer is that thedata shows no substantial effects. Social factors might account for these tinydifferences, which in any case have an unclear connection to scientific ability.Not much of a headline when phrased that way, is it? Each type of sciencehas its own source of complexity and potential for miscommunication. Yetthere are steps we can take to improve public understanding in all cases. Thefirst would be to inculcate greater understanding and acceptance of indirectscientific evidence. The information from an unmanned space mission is noless legitimate than the information from one in which people are on board.

IThis doesn’t mean never questioning an interpretation, but it also doesn’tmean equating indirect evidence with blind belief, as people sometimessuggest. Second, we might need different standards for evaluating science withurgent policy implications than research with purely theoretical value. Whenscientists say they are not certain about their predictions, it doesn’t necessarilymean they’ve found nothing substantial. It would be better if scientists weremore open about the mathematical significance of their results and if thepublic didn’t treat math as quite so scary; statistics and errors, which tell us theuncertainty in a measurement, give us the tools to evaluate new developmentsfairly.

JBut most important, people have to recognize that science can be complex.If we accept only simple stories, the description will necessarily be distorted.When advances are subtle or complicated, scientists should be willing to gothe extra distance to give proper explanations and the public should be morepatient about the truth. Even so, some difficulties are unavoidable. Mostdevelopments reflect work in progress, so the story is complex because no oneyet knows the big picture.
题目回忆

27.why the faithful science communication important?
Answer:
AScience plays an increasingly significant role in people's lives.
28.what is the reason that the anthor believe for the biggest challenges for science reporting?
Answer:
C Scientists do nottotallycomprehend the meaning of certain scientific evolution.
29.according to the 3th paragraph, the reference to the term and example of“theory of relativity ”is to demonstrate
answer:
B common people may be misled by the inaccurate choice of scientific phrase
30.which one is a good example of appropriate word choice
answer:
D Freon's destructive process on environmental
31.what is surprising finding of the harvard debates in the passage?
answer:
B The proof applied by both sides seemed to be of no big difference

32.True
33.Not given
34.Notgiven
35.False
36.wordchoices
37.colloquial terminology
38.observer
39.description
40.general relativity
参考阅读
C12T8P2
以上是小编整理的2月1日雅思真题，谢谢浏览。

希望以上的答复能对您的留学申请有所帮助。如果您有任何更详细的问题或需要进一步的协助，我强烈推荐您访问我们的留学官方网站 ，在那里您可以找到更多专业的留学考试规划和留学资料以及*的咨询服务。祝您留学申请顺利！

剑桥雅思17和12难度对比

剑桥雅思17更难。
干扰信息比较多,对学生的阅读理解能力的考察提高多选题中出现很多同义替换,需要在做题时认真分析有学生反映听力很难做,需要听两遍才行。相比以往难度稍有提升。
雅思剑桥系列是剑桥大学考试委员会外语考试部的雅思考试唯一官方指南，也是各位考生备考过程中必不可少的的参考书。里面收录的题目都是历年考场上出现过的题目，具有权威性。接下来为大家整理一下，剑17的题型，难度，词汇，场景，变化。

以上就是求剑桥雅思7 test2 阅读第1、 6、33、37、39 详解（2023年2月1日雅思阅读真题回忆）全部内容，更多相关信息，敬请关注大学路。