雅思阅读考试十大必考题型（雅思g类阅读评分标准）

雅思阅读考试十大必考题型（雅思g类阅读评分标准）相关内容，小编在这里做了整理，希望能对大家有所帮助，关于雅思阅读考试十大必考题型（雅思g类阅读评分标准）信息，一起来了解一下吧！

本文目录一览：

• 1、2020年雅思阅读考试十大必考题型
• 2、雅思g类阅读评分标准
• 3、请问2023年8月1日雅思阅读考试真题答案

2020年雅思阅读考试十大必考题型

对于雅思考试，了解一下做题的技巧，对于雅思提分是非常有帮助的，那么下面就和的我先来看看2020年雅思阅读考试十大必考题型？

十大雅思阅读题型

一、Matching（从属关系搭配题）

二、Matching（因果关系搭配）

三、MATCHING（作者及其观点搭配题）

四、Summary（摘要填空）

五、Short Answer Questions （简答题）

六、True /False/Not given（是非题）

七、adings（找小标题）

八、Multiple Choice（选择题）

九、Sentence completion（完成句子）

十、DIAGRAM/FLOWCHART/TABLE COMPLETION（填图填表题）

考试思路分析

一、雅思阅读简介

雅思阅读考试分学术类和培训类两种，分别针对申请留学的学生和计划在英语语言国家参加工作或移民的人士。三篇文章40道题目总共用时60分钟，包括将答案誊写到答题卡上的时间。

学术类阅读考试形式：IELTS考试阅读（学术类）部分共有三篇文章，考生需要回答40道题目。每一篇文章所需要回答的问题数量并不相同。每一道问题相对应一个分数。文章内容和题目均出现于问卷中。

培训类阅读考试形式：IELTS 考试阅读（培训类）部分共有三部分，文章难度由浅至深，考生需要回答40道题目。第一部分有14道题目，通常包含2到3篇短文或者若干段文字（如广告 等）。第二和第三部分分别有13道题目。第二部分通常有2篇文章，第三部分则为一段较长的文章。文章内容和题目均出现于问卷中。

二、雅思阅读文章来源

我们都知道，雅思阅读文章多从世界著名的网站杂志报刊中选取，但是了解具体是哪些网站吗？下面就给大家分享一下，大家可以在休闲的时候多浏览一下上面的文章，对大家雅思阅读备考非常有帮助。

雅思阅读A类的文章大部分选自国外人文类、经济类和科学类的知名报纸、杂志或各*、组织的研究报告。例如：

1. New Scientist 这本杂志被用到的频率最高，如剑四中的Lost for Words， Play is a Serious Business，剑五中的What’s So Funny？， Flawed Beauty： the Problem with Toughened Glass，和剑六中的多篇文章 Australia’s Sporting Success， Climate Change and the Inuit， Graying Population Stays in the Pink， Do Literate Women Make Better Mothers？

2. The Economist 列居其次，如剑五中的The Truth about the Environment， 剑六中的Delivering the Goods

3. 还有American Scientist和Scientific American这两个主要的美国学术期刊，例如剑五的Disappearing Delta和剑六的The Search for Anti-aging Pills

4. 当然还有National Geographic。但是值得注意的是，因为这是休闲杂志，所以只作为了G类的阅读，如剑六中的Pterosaurs

除了以上提到的若干来源之外，雅思A类的阅读文章还出自Nature， Discover， Time （Europe）， Boston Global， History Today等其余期刊或杂志。至于是哪次考试的哪篇文章，由于敏感原因在这里就不在透露。

G类的阅读中前两部分通常是实用性强的功能性短文，如菜单、产品说明、通知、住宿安排和广告等，非常贴近西方的实际生活。这就要求考生们争取每天阅读一定 量的原版英文报刊、书籍，如time、reader’s digest等，尤其注意其中的各种各样的广告。并非要读懂每一个字，或完全理解，只要能理解其中大至含义既可。

了解这些雅思文章出处之后对于广大考生平时进行泛读训练具有很好的指导作用。考生可以从以上杂志期刊的官方网站上搜索到相关背景文章进行有针对性的阅读训练。

三、雅思阅读文章类型

雅思阅读难备考，可能是因为文章的专业性。毕竟大多数同学平时都不太会深入了解一些自然类科技类医学类……相关领域的最新知识。因为背景知识的 缺乏，很多考生花费大量时间来理解文章，而导致做题时间紧张。所以，烤鸭们在平常的备考中要对一些不熟悉的领域涉猎一下，增强自己的背景知识理解能力。

雅思阅读文章分类如下：

1. 关于欧洲及世界社会发展，经济状况，科学动向以及文化交流的文章

自1995年雅思考试的题型做出重大改革以后，有两条原则就被命题的剑桥大学考试委员会（UCLES）反复强调非专业原则和国际化原则。为了使 不同地域，不同政治经济体制，不同肤色，不同文化背景的人能平等且毫无理解困难地参与雅思，法律及专业性较强的医学，生物学，哲学，文学，艺术等的文章已 经不再作为雅思的考查范围。

就可能涉猎的文章类型而言，以下几个方面的内容经常作为考点出现：

·世界范围的就业状况

·语言学，考古学，生物学，简单医学（单词量不会影响对文章的理解）

·世界范围内的教育状况，经济发展的问题，机遇及挑战（粮食，能源）

·女权注意及女性歧视问题

·环境保护（海洋，生物，陆地，森林等）及环境污染（化学，石油泄漏等）

·种族，民族问题

·人*炸及居住问题，城市化及相关问题（交通拥挤，设施缺乏，噪声等）

2. 关于地球，自然界的科学现象及地理现象的文章

这种文章类型在I中最为普遍，其涵盖面之广无从细分，但就最近一年以来考试文章分析，主要还是以下几种类型：

·太空，宇宙概况，以及外星生物探讨等

·全球气候变暖，厄尔尼诺，洋流异常，臭氧层破坏

·地球灾难，火山爆发，地震，彗星撞地球，森林大火，生物灭绝

3. 人类历史发展中重要事件，重要人物及重要标志性产品

这也是雅思中经常出现的一种重要的文章类型，但自1998年开始对重要人物的考查总是和重要事件交织在一起，不再单独罗列。人类历史上的重大发明和表明人类文明辉煌成就的重大事件也是重点考查内容（发明电视，电影，计算机及登陆月球）。

四、雅思阅读文章结构

雅思阅读的学术性决定了其深度和难度，却也限制了文章的结构、使其必须符合一定的学术规范。学术性文章的写作对象可以天南海北、作者观点可以光 怪陆离，但是行文论证必须规范严密，所以雅思阅读的层次结构相对固定。就目前出版的十本剑桥雅思系列而言，学术类阅读大致可分为两类：说明文和议论文。其 中，说明文从客观的角度介绍或陈述一个既定的事实，议论文则通常针对某个特定的问题进行分析和论证，有时一并提出解决的方案。如下的表格对雅思阅读及相应 的文章结构做了一个粗浅的分类：

从备考角度出发，对雅思学术阅读文章进行结构分析是一种有效的应试策略，在针对乱序题、尤其是考生弃之如敝履的信息包含题这方面，其作用尤为突出。

雅思g类阅读评分标准

雅思G类阅读考试评分标准的主要要点如下：

1、任务完成度（Task Achievement）：

考生需根据题目要求阅读指定文本，把握文章中具体的细节、主题、态度等要素，对问题进行回答。如果考生能够较好地完成这些主要任务，那么就能得到任务完成度较高的评分。

2、词汇和语法（Lexical Resource and Grammatical Range and Accuracy）：

考生应该在阅读过程中理解和运用更加高级的词汇和语法，以能够准确地回答问题并表达自己的观点。正确运用语法结构和词汇是评分标准的重要因素。

3、描述和推理（Coherence and Cohesion）：

考生需要能够通过文本中给出的信息来推断和解析文章的结构和含义，同时也需要在文章中建立明显的逻辑联系，使文章内容拥有良好的连贯性。

雅思简介：

全称为国际英语测试系统(International English Language Testing System)简称(IELTS)，是著名的国际性英语标准化水平测试之一。

雅思考试于1989年设立，由英国文化教育协会、剑桥大学考试委员会和澳大利亚教育国际开发署(IDP)共同管理。

雅思考试坚持 “沟通为本”的理念，在全球首创从听、说、读、写四方面进行英语能力全面考核的国际考试，能够立体综合地精准测评考生的英语语言运用能力。

作为全球认可度最高的国际英语测试，雅思考试获得全球超过140多个国家和地区的10,000所院校机构的认可，每年有超过300万人次参加雅思考试。

2019年1月15日，中国教育部考试中心与英国文化教育协会在京联合发布雅思、普思考试与中国英语能力等级量表对接研究结果。雅思成为率先完成与中国英语能力等级量表对接的考试。

请问2023年8月1日雅思阅读考试真题答案

您好，我是专注留学考试规划和留学咨询的小钟老师。选择留学是人生重要的决策之一，而作为您的指导，我非常高兴能为您提供最准确的留学解答和规划。无论您的问题是关于考试准备、专业选择、申请流程还是学校信息，我都在这里为您解答。更多留学资讯和学校招生介绍，欢迎随时访问。
8月1号进行了八月初的第一场雅思的考试，相信大家对真题以及答案会非常的感兴趣、今天就由小钟老师为大家介绍2023年8月1日雅思阅读考试真题答案。
一、考题解析
P1 土地沙漠化
P2 澳大利亚的鹦鹉
P3 多重任务
二、名师点评
1.8月份首场考试的难度总体中等，有出现比较多的配对题，没有出现Heading题，其余主要以常规的填空，判断和选择题为主。文章的话题和题型搭配也是在剑桥真题中都有迹可循，所以备考重心依然还是剑桥官方真题。
2. 整体分析：涉及环境类（P1）、动物类（P2）、社科类（P3）。
本次考试的P2和P3均为旧题。P2是动物类的话题，题型组合为：段落细节配对+单选+summary填空，难度中等。题型上也延续19年的出题特点，出现配对题，考察定位速度和准确度。P3也出现了段落细节配对，主要是段落细节配对+单选+判断。三种题型难度中等，但是文章理解起来略有难度。
3. 部分答案及参考文章：
Passage 1：土地沙漠化
题型及答案待确认
Passage 2：澳大利亚的鹦鹉
题型：段落细节配对+单选+Summary填空
技巧分析：由于段落细节配对是完全乱序出题，在定位时需要先做后面的单选题及填空题，最大化利用已读信息来确定答案，尽量避免重复阅读，以保证充分的做题时间。
文章内容及题目参考：
A 概况，关于一个大的生物种类
B 一些物种消失的原因，题干关键词：an example of one bird species extinct
C 一种鹦鹉不能自己存活，以捕食另一种鸟为生，吃该鸟类的蛋。题干关键词：two species competed at the expense of oneanother
D 吸引鹦鹉的原因以及鹦鹉嘴的特点。题干关键词：*ysis of reasons as Australian landscapeattract parrots
E 植物是如何适应鹦鹉。题干关键词：plants attract birds which make the animal adaptto the environment
F 南半球对英语的影响
G 两种鹦鹉从环境改变中获益并存活下来。题干关键词：two species of parrots benefit fromm theenvironment change
H 外来物种及本地鹦鹉
I 鸟类栖息地被破坏以及人类采取的措施
J 作者对于鹦鹉问题的态度
单选题：
why parrots in the whole world are lineal descendants of
选项关键词：continent split from Africa
the writer thinks parrots species beak is for
选项关键词：adjust to their suitable diet
which one is not mentioned
选项关键词：should be frequently maintained
填空题：分布在文章的前两段
one-sixth
16th century
mapmaker
John Gould
Passage 3：多重任务
题型：段落细节配对+单选+判断
参考答案及文章
28 F
29I
30C
31B
32G
33C
34B
35A
36YES
37YES
38NO
39NOT GIVEN
40NO
Passage3： multitasking
Multitasking Debate—Can you do them at the same time？
Talking on the phone while driving isn＇t the only situationwhere we＇re worse at multitasking than we might like to think we are. Newstudies have identified a bottleneck in our brains that some say means we arefundamentally incapable of true multitasking. If experimental findings reflectreal-world performance， people who think they are multitasking are probablyjust underperforming in all-or at best， all but one -of their parallelpursuits. Practice might improve your performance， but you will never be asgood as when focusing on one task at a time.
The problem， according to René Marois， a psychologist atVanderbilt University in Nashville， Tennessee， is that there＇s a sticking pointin the brain. To demonstrate this， Marois devised an experiment to locate nteers watch a screen and when a particular image appears， a red circle，say， they have to press a key with their index finger. Different colouredcircles require presses from different fingers. Typical response time is about half a second， and thevolunteers quickly reach their peak performance. Then they learn to listen todifferent recordings and respond by making a specific sound. For instance， whenthey hear a bird chirp， they have to say ＂ba＂； an electronic soundshould elicit a ＂ko＂， and so on. Again， no problem. A normal personcan do that in about half a second， with almost no effort. The trouble comeswhen Marois shows the volunteers an image， then almost immediately plays them asound. Now they＇re flummoxed. ＂If you show an image and play a sound atthe same time， one task is postponed，＂ he says. In fact，if the second taskis introduced within the half-second or so it takes to process and react to thefirst， it will simply be delayed until the first one is done. The largestdual-task delays occur when the two tasks are presented simultaneously； delaysprogressively shorten as the interval between presenting the tasks lengthens（See Diagram）.
There are at least three points where we seem to getstuck， says Marois. The first is in simply identifying what we＇re looking can take a few tenths of a second， during which time we are not able tosee and recognise a second item. This limitation is known as the＂attentional blink＂： experiments have shown that if you＇re watchingout for a particular event and a second one shows up unexpectedly any timewithin this crucial window of concentration， it may register in your visualcortex but you will be unable to act upon it. Interestingly， if you don＇texpect the first event， you have no trouble responding to the second. Whatexactly causes the attentional blink is still a matter for debate.
A second limitation is in our short-term visual ＇s estimated that we can keep track of about four items at a time， fewer ifthey are complex. This capacity shortage is thought to explain， in part， our astonishinginability to detect even huge changes in scenes that are otherwise identical，so-called ＂change blindness＂. Show people pairs of near-identicalphotos -say， aircraft engines in one picture have disappeared in the other -andthey will fail to spot the differences （if you don＇t believe it， check out theclips at /~rensink/flicker/download）. Here again， though， thereis disagreement about what the essential limiting factor really is. Does itcome down to a dearth of storage capacity， or is it about how much attention aviewer is paying？
A third limitation is that choosing a response to astimulus -braking when you see a child in the road， for instance，or replyingwhen your mother tells you over the phone that she＇s thinking of leaving yourdad -also takes brainpower. Selecting a response to one of these things willdelay by some tenths of a second your ability to respond to the other. This iscalled the ＂response selection bottleneck＂ theory， first proposed in1952.
Last December， Marois and his colleagues published apaper arguing that this bottleneck is in fact created in two different areas ofthe brain： one in the posterior lateral prefrontal cortex and another in thesuperior medial frontal cortex （Neuron， vol 52， p 1109）. They found this byscanning people＇s brains with functional MRI while the subjects struggled tochoose among eight possible responses to each of two closely timed tasks. Theydiscovered that these brain areas are not tied to any particular sense but aregenerally involved in selecting responses， and they seemed to queue theseresponses when presented with multiple tasks concurrently.
Bottleneck？ What bottleneck？
But David Meyer， a psychologist at the University ofMichigan， Ann Arbor， doesn＇t buy the bottleneck idea. He thinks dual-taskinterference is just evidence of a strategy used by the brain to prioritisemultiple activities. Meyer is known as something of an optimist by his has written papers with titles like ＂Virtually perfect time-sharing indual-task performance： Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck＂（Psychological Science， vol 12， p101）. His experiments have shown that withenough practice -at least 2000 tries -some people can execute two taskssimultaneously as competently as if they were doing them one after the suggests that there is a central cognitive processor that coordinates allthis and， what＇s more， he thinks it uses discretion： sometimes it chooses todelay one task while completing another.
Even with practice， not all people manage to achieve thisharmonious time-share， however. Meyer argues that individual differences comedown to variations in the character of the processor -some brains are just more＂cautious＂， some more ＂daring＂. And despite urban legend，there are no noticeable
differences between men and women. So， according to him，it＇s not a central bottleneck that causes dual-task interference， but rather＂adaptive executive control＂， which ＂schedules task processesappropriately to obey instructions about their relative priorities and serialorder＂.
Marois agrees that practice can sometimes eraseinterference effects. He has found that with just 1 hour of practice each dayfor two weeks， volunteers show a huge improvement at managing both his tasks atonce. Where he disagrees with Meyer is in what the brain is doing to achievethis. Marois speculates that practice might give us the chance to find lesscongested circuits to execute a task -rather like finding trusty back streetsto avoid heavy traffic on main roads -effectively making our response to thetask subconscious. After all， there are plenty of examples of subconsciou*ultitasking that most of us routinely manage： walking and talking， eating andreading， watching TV and folding the laundry.
But while some dual tasks benefit from practice， otherssimply do not. ＂Certain kinds of tasks are really hard to do two atonce，＂ says Pierre Jolicoeur at the University of Montreal， Canada， whoalso studies multitasking. Dual tasks involving a visual stimulus andskeletal-motor response （which he dubs ＂in the eye and out the hand＂）and an auditory stimulus with a verbal response （＂in the ear and out themouth＂） do seem to be amenable to practice， he says. Jolicoeur has foundthat with enough training such tasks can be performed as well together asapart. He speculates that the brain connections that they use may be somehowspecial， because we learn to speak by hearing and learn to move by looking. Butpair visual input with a verbal response， or sound to motor， and there＇s nodramatic improvement. ＂It looks like no amount of practice will allow youto combine these，＂ he says.
For research purposes， these experiments have to be keptsimple. Real-world multitasking poses much greater challenges. Even the upbeatMeyer is sceptical about how a lot of us live our lives. Instant-messaging andtrying to do your homework？ ＂It can＇t be done，＂ he says. Conducting ajob interview while answering emails？ ＂There＇s no way you wind up being asgood.＂ Needless to say， there appear to be no researchers in the area ofmultitasking who believe that you can safely drive a car and carry on a phoneconversation. In fact， last year David Strayer at the University of Utah inSalt Lake City reported that people using cellphones drive no better thandrunks （Human Factors， vol 48， p 381）. In another study， Strayer found thatusing a hands-free kit did not improve a driver＇s response time. He concludedthat what distracts a driver so badly is the very act of talking to someone whoisn＇t present in the car and therefore is unaware of the hazards facing thedriver.
“No researchers believe it＇s safe to drive a car andcarry on a phone conversation”
It probably comes as no surprise that， generallyspeaking， we get worse at multitasking as we age. According to Art Kramer atthe University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign， who studies how ageing affectsour cognitive abilities， we peak in our 20s. Though the decline is slow throughour 30s and on into our 50s， it is there； and after 55， it becomes moreprecipitous. In one study， he and his colleagues had both young and oldparticipants do a simulated driving task while carrying on a conversation. Hefound that while young drivers tended to miss background changes， older driversfailed to notice things that were highly relevant. Likewise， older subjects hadmore trouble paying attention to the more important parts of a scene than youngdrivers.
It＇s not all bad news for over-55s， though. Kramer alsofound that older people can benefit from practice. Not only did they learn toperform better， brain scans showed that underlying that improvement was achange in the way their brains become active.
Whileit＇s clear that practice can often make a difference， especially as we age， thebasic facts remain sobering. ＂We have this impression of an almightycomplex brain，＂ says Marois， ＂and yet we have very humbling andcrippling limits.＂ For most of our history， we probably never needed to domore than one thing at a time， he says， and so we haven＇t evolved to be ableto. Perhaps we will in future， though. We might yet look back one day on peoplelike Debbie and Alun as ancestors of a new breed of true multitaskers.

以上信息希望能帮助您在留学申请的道路上少走弯路。如果您还有更多问题或需要深入探讨，不要犹豫，您可以在我们的留学官方网站上找到更丰富的考试资讯、留学指导和*专家咨询服务。我们的团队始终站在您的角度，为您的留学梦想全力以赴。祝您申请顺利！

以上就是雅思阅读考试十大必考题型（雅思g类阅读评分标准）全部内容了，了解更多相关信息，关注大学路。